The RSI Indicator for ABAT moved out of oversold territory on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 27 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 22 of the 27 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 81%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 49 of 67 cases where ABAT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 73%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for ABAT just turned positive on October 28, 2026. Looking at past instances where ABAT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 32 of 41 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Following a +18.83% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where ABAT advanced for three days, in 172 of 223 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 77%.
ABAT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on November 10, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on ABAT as a result. In 84 of 94 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where ABAT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for ABAT entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 12 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 73 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.506) is normal, around the industry mean (47.597). P/E Ratio (-2.302) is within average values for comparable stocks, (56.657). ABAT's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (12.407) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. ABAT’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. ABAT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock worse than average.
Moving higher for three straight days is viewed as a bullish sign. Keep an eye on this stock for future growth. Considering data from situations where CDTG advanced for three days, in 89 of 100 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 24 of 27 cases where CDTG's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 89%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for CDTG just turned positive on November 10, 2026. Looking at past instances where CDTG's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 18 of 23 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
CDTG may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 29, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on CDTG as a result. In 46 of 46 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where CDTG declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 90%.
The Aroon Indicator for CDTG entered a downward trend on November 05, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 20 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (0.089) is normal, around the industry mean (47.597). P/E Ratio (-0.043) is within average values for comparable stocks, (56.657). CDTG's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.000) is slightly lower than the industry average of (1.132). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.016) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.032) is also within normal values, averaging (72.867).
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 89 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. CDTG’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 97 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. CDTG’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock worse than average.
ABAT | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ABAT | CDTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while CDTG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDTG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ABAT (@Environmental Services) experienced а +5.60% price change this week, while CDTG (@Environmental Services) price change was -9.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.74%.
ABAT is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABAT has been loosely correlated with AREC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABAT jumps, then AREC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABAT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABAT | 100% | -7.04% | ||
| AREC - ABAT | 62% Loosely correlated | -7.69% | ||
| AQMS - ABAT | 39% Loosely correlated | -6.00% | ||
| PESI - ABAT | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| GWAV - ABAT | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.69% | ||
| AWX - ABAT | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor tells us that CDTG and ABAT have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDTG and ABAT's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CDTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDTG | 100% | +1.50% | ||
| ABAT - CDTG | 17% Poorly correlated | -7.04% | ||
| PESI - CDTG | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.77% | ||
| AREC - CDTG | 7% Poorly correlated | -7.69% | ||
| DXST - CDTG | 6% Poorly correlated | -18.00% | ||
| QRHC - CDTG | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
More | ||||
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RFIX | 36.37 | 0.22 | +0.61% |
| Simplify Downside Interest Rate Hedge Strategy ETF | |||
| AETH | 37.57 | N/A | N/A |
| Bitwise Trendwise Ether and Treasuries Rotation Strategy ETF (AETH) | |||
| GVI | 103.89 | -0.51 | -0.49% |
| iShares Intermediate Government/Credit Bond ETF (GVI) | |||
| PPI | 19.30 | -0.14 | -0.72% |
| Astoria Real Assets ETF (PPI) | |||
| XRP | 11.80 | -0.38 | -3.12% |
| Bitwise XRP ETF (XRP) | |||