ABCB
Price
$88.30
Change
+$0.94 (+1.08%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.95B
30 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLG
Price
$15.04
Change
+$0.01 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.26B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABCB vs FLG

ABCB vs FLG Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABCB vs. FLG commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABCB is a Buy and FLG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ABCB: $87.36 vs. FLG: $15.03)
Brand notoriety: ABCB and FLG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABCB: 93% vs. FLG: 140%
Market capitalization -- ABCB: $5.95B vs. FLG: $6.26B
ABCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $5.95B. FLG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABCB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ABCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABCB is a better buy in the long-term than FLG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABCB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLG is a better buy in the short-term than ABCB.

Price Growth

ABCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while FLG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABCB is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

FLG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.31% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLG($6.27B) has a higher market cap than ABCB($5.95B). FLG YTD gains are higher at: 19.559 vs. ABCB (17.933). FLG has more cash in the bank: 401M vs. ABCB (217M). ABCB has less debt than FLG: ABCB (1.02B) vs FLG (11.2B). FLG has higher revenues than ABCB: FLG (2.07B) vs ABCB (1.2B).
ABCBFLGABCB / FLG
Capitalization5.95B6.27B95%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.93319.55992%
P/E Ratio13.74N/A-
Revenue1.2B2.07B58%
Total Cash217M401M54%
Total Debt1.02B11.2B9%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ABCB vs FLG: Fundamental Ratings
ABCB
FLG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2022
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3780
SMR RATING
1..100
2621
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3599
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLG's Valuation (57) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ABCB (78) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (80) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

FLG's SMR Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ABCB (26) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FLG’s stock grew similarly to ABCB’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FLG (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew similarly to FLG’s over the last 12 months.

ABCB's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLG (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ABCB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABCBFLG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABCB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VTV218.652.15
+0.99%
Vanguard Value ETF
DVXK38.230.04
+0.09%
WEBs Technology XLK Defined Vol ETF
PID22.10-0.02
-0.08%
Invesco International Div Achiev ETF
ZTWO50.38-0.05
-0.10%
F/M 2-Yr Invmt Grd Corp Bd ETF
QWLD150.53-0.32
-0.21%
State Street® SPDR® MSCI Wld StrtFcs ETF

FLG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLG has been closely correlated with VLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLG jumps, then VLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLG
1D Price
Change %
FLG100%
+2.59%
VLY - FLG
73%
Closely correlated
+1.06%
AUB - FLG
72%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
UBSI - FLG
71%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
BKU - FLG
70%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
ABCB - FLG
70%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
More