Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABEMX vs FNWFX
ABEMX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ABEMX vs FNWFX
ABEMX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABEMX vs. FNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABEMX is a Hold and FNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ABEMX (1.14B). FNWFX pays higher dividends than ABEMX: FNWFX (1.24) vs ABEMX (0.67). ABEMX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: ABEMX (19 years) vs FNWFX (9 years). ABEMX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FNWFX (0.57). FNWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. ABEMX (35.00). ABEMX (1000000) and FNWFX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. ABEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.40 vs. FNWFX (31.43). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 21.16 vs. ABEMX (11.92).
| ABEMX | FNWFX | ABEMX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 0.57 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.20 | 0.57 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.294 | 18.824 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 1.24 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.40 | 31.43 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.64 | 58.25 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.92 | 21.16 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 106.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers