Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABFAX vs CLBAX
ABFAX vs CLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABFAX vs CLBAX
ABFAX vs CLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABFAX vs. CLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABFAX is a Hold and CLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABFAX (108M). ABFAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: ABFAX (2.00) vs CLBAX (1.78). ABFAX was incepted earlier than CLBAX: ABFAX (16 years) vs CLBAX (24 years). ABFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ABFAX (31.00). ABFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABFAX: CLBAX (250) vs ABFAX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. ABFAX (5.48). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.04 vs. ABFAX (-5.76).
| ABFAX | CLBAX | ABFAX / CLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.58 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.58 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.912 | 8.651 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.78 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 14.90 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.30 | 42.62 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.76 | 35.04 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.86 | 96.94 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers