Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABFAX vs CLBAX
ABFAX vs CLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABFAX vs CLBAX
ABFAX vs CLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABFAX vs. CLBAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABFAX is a Hold and CLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. ABFAX (107M). ABFAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: ABFAX (1.93) vs CLBAX (1.82). ABFAX was incepted earlier than CLBAX: ABFAX (16 years) vs CLBAX (25 years). ABFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ABFAX (31.00). ABFAX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABFAX: CLBAX (250) vs ABFAX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. ABFAX (5.08). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. ABFAX (-1.81).
| ABFAX | CLBAX | ABFAX / CLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.58 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.58 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.568 | 10.098 | 85% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 107M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.93 | 1.82 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.08 | 12.63 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.57 | 45.00 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.81 | 35.82 | -5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.79 | 94.05 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers