Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABFAX vs CLBFX
ABFAX vs CLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABFAX vs CLBFX
ABFAX vs CLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABFAX vs. CLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABFAX is a Hold and CLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABFAX (108M). ABFAX (2.00) and CLBFX (1.92) have matching dividends . ABFAX was incepted earlier than CLBFX: ABFAX (16 years) vs CLBFX (24 years). ABFAX (1.19) is less costly to investors than CLBFX (0.66). CLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. ABFAX (31.00). CLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABFAX: CLBFX (250) vs ABFAX (2500). CLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. ABFAX (5.48). CLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.14 vs. ABFAX (-5.76).
| ABFAX | CLBFX | ABFAX / CLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.66 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.912 | 8.738 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 108M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.00 | 1.92 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.48 | 15.06 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.30 | 43.29 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.76 | 36.14 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.86 | 100.76 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers