Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABGNX vs RLBAX
ABGNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABGNX vs RLBAX
ABGNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABGNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABGNX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABGNX (913M). ABGNX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ABGNX (1.75) vs RLBAX (1.14). ABGNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ABGNX (9 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than ABGNX (0.69). ABGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). ABGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: ABGNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.80 vs. ABGNX (14.55). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.83 vs. ABGNX (9.68).
| ABGNX | RLBAX | ABGNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.645 | 8.988 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 913M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.14 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.55 | 15.80 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.64 | 41.07 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.68 | 31.83 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 80.24 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement