Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABGNX vs RLBAX
ABGNX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABGNX vs RLBAX
ABGNX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABGNX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABGNX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. ABGNX (925M). ABGNX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ABGNX (1.75) vs RLBAX (1.14). ABGNX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ABGNX (9 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than ABGNX (0.69). ABGNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RLBAX (50.00). ABGNX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: ABGNX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.80 vs. ABGNX (15.89). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.17 vs. ABGNX (10.23).
| ABGNX | RLBAX | ABGNX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.32 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.271 | 9.354 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 925M | 279B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.14 | 154% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.89 | 16.80 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.31 | 42.23 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.23 | 31.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 77.06 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement