Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABHFX vs PIMAX
ABHFX vs PIMAX Comparison
Open Charts ABHFX vs PIMAX
American High-Income Municipal Bond F-1
Price$15.39
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.04B
Victory Pioneer High Income Mun A
Price$6.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets932.49M
ABHFX vs PIMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABHFX vs. PIMAX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABHFX is a Hold and PIMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABHFX has more cash in the bank: 13B vs. PIMAX (932M). PIMAX pays higher dividends than ABHFX: PIMAX (5.14) vs ABHFX (3.99). ABHFX was incepted earlier than PIMAX: ABHFX (25 years) vs PIMAX (19 years). PIMAX (0.87) is less costly to investors than ABHFX (0.68). PIMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ABHFX (28.00). ABHFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PIMAX: ABHFX (250) vs PIMAX (1000). PIMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.99 vs. ABHFX (0.86). PIMAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.51 vs. ABHFX (-3.25).
| ABHFX | PIMAX | ABHFX / PIMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.82 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.87 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.654 | 0.145 | 452% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 13B | 932M | 1,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.99 | 5.14 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.86 | 1.99 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.73 | 16.23 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.25 | 4.51 | -72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 4.10 | 28.68 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement