Advertisement
ABL vs TRON
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABL is a Buy and TRON is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ABL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTRON’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ABL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TRON’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ABL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRON’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ABL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TRON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
ABL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -7.83% price change this week, while TRON (@Recreational Products) price change was -37.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.14%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.95%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Life/Health Insurance (-0.33% weekly)Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
@Recreational Products (+2.77% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| ABL | TRON | ABL / TRON | |
| Capitalization | 632M | 58.4M | 1,082% |
| EBITDA | 50.5M | -984.6K | -5,129% |
| Gain YTD | -15.837 | -76.522 | 21% |
| P/E Ratio | 7920.49 | 164.29 | 4,821% |
| Revenue | 162M | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 74.8M | 18.4K | 406,522% |
| Total Debt | 362M | N/A | - |
| ABL | TRON | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 30% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 21% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 36% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 9% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 33% | 1 day ago 12% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 58% | 25 days ago 37% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 1 day ago 33% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 31% | 1 day ago 44% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 30% | N/A |
Advertisement
ABL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ABL and AACI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ABL and AACI's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABL | 100% | +1.07% | ||
| AACI - ABL | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SOC - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.78% | ||
| TRON - ABL | 23% Poorly correlated | -22.86% | ||
| ABLLL - ABL | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.03% | ||
| GNW - ABL | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||
TRON and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRON has been loosely correlated with NHICU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRON jumps, then NHICU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TRON | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TRON | 100% | -22.86% | ||
| NHICU - TRON | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| CMCAF - TRON | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SPKL - TRON | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| DMYY - TRON | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| ABL - TRON | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.07% | ||
More | ||||