ABNB
Price
$123.81
Change
-$1.56 (-1.24%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
75.8B
53 days until earnings call
BFAM
Price
$116.82
Change
+$0.49 (+0.42%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
6.64B
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABNB vs BFAM

Header iconABNB vs BFAM Comparison
Open Charts ABNB vs BFAMBanner chart's image
Airbnb
Price$123.81
Change-$1.56 (-1.24%)
Volume$4.33M
Capitalization75.8B
Bright Horizons Family Solutions
Price$116.82
Change+$0.49 (+0.42%)
Volume$372.99K
Capitalization6.64B
ABNB vs BFAM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ABNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABNB vs. BFAM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABNB is a StrongBuy and BFAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (ABNB: $123.81 vs. BFAM: $116.82)
Brand notoriety: ABNB and BFAM are both not notable
ABNB represents the Consumer Sundries, while BFAM is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABNB: 96% vs. BFAM: 65%
Market capitalization -- ABNB: $75.8B vs. BFAM: $6.64B
ABNB [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $75.8B. BFAM’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $6.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $178.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.39B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.29B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBFAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABNB is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BFAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BFAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ABNB is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

ABNB (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а -5.15% price change this week, while BFAM (@Personnel Services) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +9.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.38%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -6.56%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +216.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABNB is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+9.70% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (-6.56% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABNB($75.8B) has a higher market cap than BFAM($6.64B). BFAM has higher P/E ratio than ABNB: BFAM (38.30) vs ABNB (30.43). BFAM YTD gains are higher at: 5.386 vs. ABNB (-5.783). ABNB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.61B vs. BFAM (375M). ABNB has more cash in the bank: 11.4B vs. BFAM (179M). BFAM has less debt than ABNB: BFAM (1.75B) vs ABNB (2.28B). ABNB has higher revenues than BFAM: ABNB (11.6B) vs BFAM (2.79B).
ABNBBFAMABNB / BFAM
Capitalization75.8B6.64B1,141%
EBITDA2.61B375M695%
Gain YTD-5.7835.386-107%
P/E Ratio30.4338.3079%
Revenue11.6B2.79B416%
Total Cash11.4B179M6,369%
Total Debt2.28B1.75B130%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
73
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
58
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
38

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABNBBFAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BFAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCHI23.470.68
+2.97%
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
NUDM36.810.20
+0.55%
Nuveen ESG Intl Dev Mkts Eq ETF
GCC20.62-0.06
-0.29%
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity Stgy Fd
JGLO66.16-0.37
-0.56%
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
BTCZ3.02-0.11
-3.51%
T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF

ABNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ABNB has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ABNB jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ABNB
1D Price
Change %
ABNB100%
-1.24%
VIK - ABNB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
EXPE - ABNB
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
TNL - ABNB
58%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
RCL - ABNB
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.16%
BKNG - ABNB
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.26%
More

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFAM has been loosely correlated with MCW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BFAM jumps, then MCW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
+0.42%
MCW - BFAM
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
RCL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-2.16%
More