ABNB
Price
$138.80
Change
-$0.39 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
82.61B
50 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BFAM
Price
$65.19
Change
+$1.17 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.37B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ABNB vs BFAM

ABNB vs BFAM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ABNB vs. BFAM commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABNB is a StrongBuy and BFAM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (ABNB: $139.19 vs. BFAM: $64.02)
Brand notoriety: ABNB and BFAM are both not notable
ABNB represents the Consumer Sundries, while BFAM is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ABNB: 92% vs. BFAM: 65%
Market capitalization -- ABNB: $82.61B vs. BFAM: $3.37B
ABNB [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $82.61B. BFAM’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $3.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $130B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $21.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $25.93B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $3.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ABNB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBFAM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ABNB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ABNB is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ABNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BFAM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ABNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BFAM is a better buy in the short-term than ABNB.

Price Growth

ABNB (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +0.17% price change this week, while BFAM (@Personnel Services) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.67%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +98.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

ABNB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (-1.92% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+98.24% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ABNB($82.6B) has a higher market cap than BFAM($3.37B). ABNB has higher P/E ratio than BFAM: ABNB (34.37) vs BFAM (19.28). ABNB YTD gains are higher at: 2.557 vs. BFAM (-36.864). ABNB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.59B vs. BFAM (412M). ABNB has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. BFAM (133M). BFAM has less debt than ABNB: BFAM (1.87B) vs ABNB (2.53B). ABNB has higher revenues than BFAM: ABNB (12.6B) vs BFAM (2.98B).
ABNBBFAMABNB / BFAM
Capitalization82.6B3.37B2,452%
EBITDA2.59B412M629%
Gain YTD2.557-36.864-7%
P/E Ratio34.3719.28178%
Revenue12.6B2.98B423%
Total Cash12B133M9,023%
Total Debt2.53B1.87B135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
56
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
79
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
94
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ABNBBFAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ABNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BIOX0.390.01
+3.54%
Bioceres Crop Solutions Corp
PNC234.712.67
+1.15%
PNC Financial Services Group
HWC70.790.55
+0.78%
Hancock Whitney Corp
SILC44.96-1.99
-4.23%
Silicom Ltd
SBH13.01-0.82
-5.93%
Sally Beauty Holdings

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFAM and TNL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFAM and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
-0.47%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
CSV - BFAM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
RCL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More