Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPAX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
Price$12.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets87M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.08
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.73B
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 258B vs. ABPAX (87M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPAX: RLBFX (2.05) vs ABPAX (1.20). ABPAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.28 vs. ABPAX (2.39). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.46 vs. ABPAX (11.36).
| ABPAX | RLBFX | ABPAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.29 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.29 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.041 | 11.562 | 44% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 87M | 258B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.05 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.39 | 10.28 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.79 | 40.92 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.36 | 41.46 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.33 | 78.40 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement