Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPAX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
Price$12.69
Change+$0.06 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets88.35M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$37.27
Change+$0.08 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets253.86B
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPAX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. ABPAX (88.4M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPAX: RLBFX (2.10) vs ABPAX (1.22). ABPAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). ABPAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. ABPAX (4.91). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.40 vs. ABPAX (12.58).
| ABPAX | RLBFX | ABPAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.29 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.29 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.380 | 9.189 | 48% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 88.4M | 254B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 2.10 | 58% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.91 | 10.60 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.05 | 35.79 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.58 | 41.40 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.54 | 68.15 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement