Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPAX vs RLBFX
AB Sustainable Thematic Bal Port A
Price$12.80
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.02M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$38.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. ABPAX (85M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPAX: RLBFX (1.97) vs ABPAX (1.16). ABPAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPAX (22 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). ABPAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. ABPAX (4.19). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.53 vs. ABPAX (8.01).
| ABPAX | RLBFX | ABPAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.29 | 345% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.29 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.702 | 14.331 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.16 | 1.97 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.19 | 9.32 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.23 | 42.18 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.01 | 40.53 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.17 | 74.39 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement