Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPAX vs RLBFX
ABPAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABPAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABPAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABPAX (73.1M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPAX: RLBFX (2.03) vs ABPAX (1.20). ABPAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPAX (23 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPAX (1.25) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). ABPAX (51.00) and RLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABPAX: RLBFX (250) vs ABPAX (2500). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.40 vs. ABPAX (7.02). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.75 vs. ABPAX (2.47).
| ABPAX | RLBFX | ABPAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.30 | 337% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.30 | 417% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.459 | 8.732 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 2.03 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.02 | 12.40 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.25 | 40.94 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.47 | 34.75 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.65 | 85.40 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers