Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPZX vs RLBAX
ABPZX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts ABPZX vs RLBAX
ABPZX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABPZX (77.1M). ABPZX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: ABPZX (1.46) vs RLBAX (1.14). ABPZX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: ABPZX (5 years) vs RLBAX (24 years). RLBAX (1.32) is less costly to investors than ABPZX (0.94). ABPZX (51.00) and RLBAX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. ABPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: ABPZX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.01 vs. ABPZX (10.22).
| ABPZX | RLBAX | ABPZX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 1.32 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.32 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.616 | 9.339 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.1M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 1.14 | 128% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 16.01 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.86 | 36.51 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 33.42 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 78.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement