Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABPZX vs RLBFX
ABPZX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts ABPZX vs RLBFX
ABPZX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABPZX (77.1M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than ABPZX: RLBFX (2.02) vs ABPZX (1.46). ABPZX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: ABPZX (5 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). ABPZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). ABPZX (51.00) and RLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. ABPZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: ABPZX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.28 vs. ABPZX (10.22).
| ABPZX | RLBFX | ABPZX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.76 | 0.30 | 253% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.30 | 313% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.616 | 9.885 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 77.1M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.46 | 2.02 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.22 | 17.28 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.86 | 37.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 39.48 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 92.04 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers