Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTCX vs RGVFX
ABTCX vs RGVFX Comparison
Open Charts ABTCX vs RGVFX
ABTCX vs RGVFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTCX vs. RGVFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTCX is a Hold and RGVFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGVFX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. ABTCX (454M). RGVFX pays higher dividends than ABTCX: RGVFX (4.33) vs ABTCX (3.00). ABTCX was incepted earlier than RGVFX: ABTCX (16 years) vs RGVFX (24 years). ABTCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than RGVFX (0.30). ABTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 218.00 vs. RGVFX (50.00). RGVFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTCX: RGVFX (250) vs ABTCX (2500). RGVFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.77 vs. ABTCX (3.13). RGVFX return over 5 years is better than : 1.04 vs. ABTCX (-8.10).
| ABTCX | RGVFX | ABTCX / RGVFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.30 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.416 | -0.302 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 24.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 4.33 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 3.77 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.04 | 11.44 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.10 | 1.04 | -775% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.64 | 9.40 | -28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement