Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTCX vs UGSFX
ABTCX vs UGSFX Comparison
Open Charts ABTCX vs UGSFX
ABTCX vs UGSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTCX vs. UGSFX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTCX is a Hold and UGSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UGSFX has more cash in the bank: 24.3B vs. ABTCX (454M). UGSFX pays higher dividends than ABTCX: UGSFX (3.95) vs ABTCX (3.00). ABTCX was incepted earlier than UGSFX: ABTCX (16 years) vs UGSFX (25 years). ABTCX (1.47) is less costly to investors than UGSFX (0.68). ABTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 218.00 vs. UGSFX (50.00). UGSFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTCX: UGSFX (250) vs ABTCX (2500). UGSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. ABTCX (3.13). UGSFX return over 5 years is better than : -0.83 vs. ABTCX (-8.10).
| ABTCX | UGSFX | ABTCX / UGSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.68 | 216% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.47 | 0.68 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.416 | -0.543 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 454M | 24.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.00 | 3.95 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.13 | 3.37 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.04 | 10.16 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.10 | -0.83 | 976% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.64 | 5.53 | -48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement