Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$9.93
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.73B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.96
Change-$0.04 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.36B
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.4B vs. ABTFX (2.73B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.56) vs ABTFX (3.44). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (15 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.96). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ABTFX (23.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHCCX (3000). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.85 vs. NHCCX (-4.73). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 2.84 vs. ABTFX (2.36).
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.234 | -3.650 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.73B | 13.4B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 4.56 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | -4.73 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.11 | 5.61 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.36 | 2.84 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.34 | 13.26 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers