Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.34
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.78B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.47
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.14B
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. ABTFX (2.78B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.52) vs ABTFX (3.44). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (16 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.87). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: NHCCX (200) vs ABTFX (2500). NHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.92 vs. ABTFX (0.19). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.58 vs. ABTFX (3.51).
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.80 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.80 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.580 | 1.334 | 193% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 200 | 1,250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 13.1B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 4.52 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.19 | 0.92 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.05 | 13.98 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.51 | 6.58 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.09 | 18.49 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement