Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$10.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.77B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.31
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ABTFX (2.77B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.69) vs ABTFX (3.20). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (16 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.96). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: NHCCX (200) vs ABTFX (2500). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.46 vs. NHCCX (-2.20). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.73 vs. ABTFX (2.00).
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.80 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.80 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.210 | -0.247 | -490% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 200 | 1,250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.77B | 12.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.20 | 4.69 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | -2.20 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.62 | 8.03 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.00 | 4.73 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.49 | 17.20 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers