Ad is loading...
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$9.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.69B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.05
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. ABTFX (2.69B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.39) vs ABTFX (3.22). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (15 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.96). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ABTFX (23.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHCCX (3000). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.64 vs. NHCCX (-0.32). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.98 vs. ABTFX (6.33).
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.411 | -3.774 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.69B | 14.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 4.39 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.64 | -0.32 | -515% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.47 | -2.40 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.33 | 7.98 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.03 | 10.70 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...