Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
AB High Income Municipal C
Price$9.94
Change-$0.04 (-0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.7B
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.93
Change-$0.08 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.72B
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.7B vs. ABTFX (2.7B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.49) vs ABTFX (3.29). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (15 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.96). NHCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 28.00 vs. ABTFX (23.00). ABTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: ABTFX (2500) vs NHCCX (3000). ABTFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.96 vs. NHCCX (-2.08). NHCCX (7.42) and ABTFX (7.27) have equivalent 5 years return.
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 2.91 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.648 | -3.135 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 3000 | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.7B | 13.7B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.29 | 4.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.96 | -2.08 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.88 | 4.46 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.27 | 7.42 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.03 | 13.67 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement