Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts ABTFX vs NHCCX
ABTFX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABTFX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABTFX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. ABTFX (2.8B). NHCCX pays higher dividends than ABTFX: NHCCX (4.63) vs ABTFX (3.63). ABTFX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: ABTFX (16 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than ABTFX (1.87). ABTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. NHCCX (18.00). NHCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABTFX: NHCCX (200) vs ABTFX (2500). NHCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.82 vs. ABTFX (6.48). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : -3.41 vs. ABTFX (-3.85).
| ABTFX | NHCCX | ABTFX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.80 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 2.80 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.064 | 2.537 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 200 | 1,250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.8B | 12.6B | 22% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.63 | 4.63 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.48 | 7.82 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.27 | 8.59 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.85 | -3.41 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.85 | 15.46 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement