Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWCX vs FBAFX
ABWCX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWCX vs FBAFX
ABWCX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. ABWCX (426M). ABWCX (2.02) and FBAFX (2.00) have matching dividends . ABWCX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: ABWCX (23 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). ABWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). ABWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWCX: FBAFX (250) vs ABWCX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. ABWCX (5.14). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.59 vs. ABWCX (-0.91).
| ABWCX | FBAFX | ABWCX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.33 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.33 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.824 | 9.400 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 426M | 288B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.02 | 2.00 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 13.48 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.13 | 43.25 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.91 | 37.59 | -2% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.39 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement