Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWCX vs FBAFX
ABWCX vs FBAFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWCX vs FBAFX
ABWCX vs FBAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWCX vs. FBAFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWCX is a StrongBuy and FBAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBAFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. ABWCX (423M). FBAFX (2.01) and ABWCX (1.99) have matching dividends . ABWCX was incepted earlier than FBAFX: ABWCX (23 years) vs FBAFX (6 years). ABWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than FBAFX (0.33). ABWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. FBAFX (50.00). FBAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWCX: FBAFX (250) vs ABWCX (2500). FBAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.56 vs. ABWCX (5.10). FBAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.21 vs. ABWCX (-2.29).
| ABWCX | FBAFX | ABWCX / FBAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.33 | 576% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.33 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.333 | 10.125 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 423M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 2.01 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 11.56 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.87 | 43.50 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | 35.21 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers