Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWCX vs RLEFX
ABWCX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWCX vs RLEFX
AB All Market Total Return C
Price$16.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets432.85M
American Funds American Balanced R5E
Price$38.79
Change+$0.22 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets263.39B
ABWCX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWCX vs. RLEFX commentary
Oct 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWCX is a Hold and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. ABWCX (433M). ABWCX pays higher dividends than RLEFX: ABWCX (2.07) vs RLEFX (1.92). ABWCX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: ABWCX (22 years) vs RLEFX (10 years). ABWCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). ABWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 182.00 vs. RLEFX (44.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWCX: RLEFX (250) vs ABWCX (2500). ABWCX (8.93) and RLEFX (8.65) have marching annual gain over last year. RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.26 vs. ABWCX (17.25).
| ABWCX | RLEFX | ABWCX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.86 | 0.39 | 477% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.39 | 479% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.136 | 13.612 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 433M | 263B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 1.92 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.93 | 8.65 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.70 | 52.99 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.25 | 44.26 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.65 | N/A | - |