Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ABWCX vs RLEFX
ABWCX vs RLEFX Comparison
Open Charts ABWCX vs RLEFX
ABWCX vs RLEFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ABWCX vs. RLEFX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ABWCX is a StrongBuy and RLEFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLEFX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. ABWCX (423M). ABWCX (1.99) and RLEFX (1.95) have matching dividends . ABWCX was incepted earlier than RLEFX: ABWCX (23 years) vs RLEFX (11 years). ABWCX (1.91) is less costly to investors than RLEFX (0.39). ABWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. RLEFX (50.00). RLEFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ABWCX: RLEFX (250) vs ABWCX (2500). RLEFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. ABWCX (5.10). RLEFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.85 vs. ABWCX (-2.29).
| ABWCX | RLEFX | ABWCX / RLEFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 0.39 | 487% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.91 | 0.39 | 490% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.333 | 10.075 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 423M | 283B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.99 | 1.95 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.10 | 11.47 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.87 | 43.23 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.29 | 32.85 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.20 | 85.75 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement