Ad is loading...
ACA
Price
$108.34
Change
+$2.51 (+2.37%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
89 days until earnings call
MTZ
Price
$142.06
Change
+$1.24 (+0.88%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
97 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ACA vs MTZ

Header iconACA vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts ACA vs MTZBanner chart's image
Arcosa
Price$108.34
Change+$2.51 (+2.37%)
Volume$361.64K
CapitalizationN/A
MasTec
Price$142.06
Change+$1.24 (+0.88%)
Volume$984.47K
CapitalizationN/A
ACA vs MTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACA vs. MTZ commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACA is a Buy and MTZ is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (ACA: $108.34 vs. MTZ: $142.06)
Brand notoriety: ACA: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACA: 145% vs. MTZ: 113%
Market capitalization -- ACA: $5.16B vs. MTZ: $11.26B
ACA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.16B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $11.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACA is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ACA and MTZ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ACA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.50% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.59%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACA is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+1.97% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($11.3B) has a higher market cap than ACA($5.16B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than ACA: MTZ (124.62) vs ACA (40.24). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: 87.612 vs. ACA (31.406). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. ACA (374M). ACA has more cash in the bank: 757M vs. MTZ (181M). ACA has less debt than MTZ: ACA (1.24B) vs MTZ (2.73B). MTZ has higher revenues than ACA: MTZ (12.2B) vs ACA (2.49B).
ACAMTZACA / MTZ
Capitalization5.16B11.3B46%
EBITDA374M907M41%
Gain YTD31.40687.61236%
P/E Ratio40.24124.6232%
Revenue2.49B12.2B20%
Total Cash757M181M418%
Total Debt1.24B2.73B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACA vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
ACA
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2418
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
732
SMR RATING
1..100
8285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACA's Valuation (83) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTZ (95) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTZ (32) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's SMR Rating (82) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is in the same range as MTZ (85) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as ACA (40) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to ACA’s over the last 12 months.

ACA's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Trucks Or Construction Or Farm Machinery industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ACA’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACAMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ACA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LRGF61.660.60
+0.98%
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
FCEF22.110.11
+0.52%
First Trust Income Opportunity ETF
SVXY50.270.23
+0.46%
ProShares Short VIX Short-Term Futures
BLKC27.520.02
+0.07%
Invesco Aln Glxy Blkh Usr&Dctrzd Cmr ETF
GTIP48.74-0.07
-0.14%
Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
+0.88%
PWR - MTZ
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
IESC - MTZ
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
ACA - MTZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.37%
PRIM - MTZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.53%
APG - MTZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
More