Advertisement
ACCS vs PGNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACCS is a Hold and PGNY is a Hold.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACCS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGNY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ACCS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PGNY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
| ACCS | PGNY | ACCS / PGNY | |
| Capitalization | 49.3M | 3.52B | 1% |
| EBITDA | 5.38M | 64.5M | 8% |
| Gain YTD | 3.579 | 22.841 | 16% |
| P/E Ratio | 63.58 | 58.89 | 108% |
| Revenue | 33.4M | 1.09B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 5.71M | 371M | 2% |
| Total Debt | 20.9M | 19.4M | 108% |
ACCS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ACCS | PGNY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 76% | N/A |
Advertisement
ACCS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that ACCS and DCBO have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACCS and DCBO's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACCS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACCS | 100% | +1.75% | ||
| DCBO - ACCS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.88% | ||
| AKAM - ACCS | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.86% | ||
| PGNY - ACCS | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNCR - ACCS | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| SSNC - ACCS | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More | ||||
PGNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PGNY has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PGNY jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PGNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PGNY | 100% | N/A | ||
| CLSK - PGNY | 54% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| COIN - PGNY | 53% Loosely correlated | +5.00% | ||
| RIOT - PGNY | 48% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HOOD - PGNY | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.42% | ||
| MFON - PGNY | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||