Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKAX
ACEAX vs FHKAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKAX
ACEAX vs FHKAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKAX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a StrongBuy and FHKAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKAX has more cash in the bank: 2.78B vs. ACEAX (46.9M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKAX: ACEAX (4.65) vs FHKAX (1.16). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKAX: ACEAX (8 years) vs FHKAX (18 years). ACEAX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FHKAX (1.17). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. FHKAX (34.00). FHKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than ACEAX (4%) vs ACEAX (4%). FHKAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKAX (250) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 64.63 vs. ACEAX (13.79). FHKAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.34 vs. ACEAX (-14.06).
| ACEAX | FHKAX | ACEAX / FHKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 1.17 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.17 | 168% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.151 | 32.899 | -7% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 74% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9M | 2.78B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.65 | 1.16 | 401% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.79 | 64.63 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.61 | 119.53 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.06 | 34.34 | -41% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 210.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers