Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEAX vs FHKCX
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts ACEAX vs FHKCX
ACEAX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEAX vs. FHKCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEAX is a Buy and FHKCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 2.58B vs. ACEAX (46.7M). ACEAX pays higher dividends than FHKCX: ACEAX (4.70) vs FHKCX (1.37). ACEAX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: ACEAX (8 years) vs FHKCX (31 years). ACEAX (1.97) is less costly to investors than FHKCX (0.91). ACEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. FHKCX (34.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEAX: FHKCX (0) vs ACEAX (2500). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 53.15 vs. ACEAX (10.87). FHKCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.32 vs. ACEAX (-6.19).
| ACEAX | FHKCX | ACEAX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.91 | 165% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 0.91 | 216% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.564 | 28.084 | -6% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.7M | 2.58B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.70 | 1.37 | 344% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.87 | 53.15 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.51 | 111.17 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.19 | 41.32 | -15% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 201.47 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers