Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs FNFWX
ACEMX vs FNFWX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs FNFWX
ACEMX vs FNFWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ACEMX (25M). FNFWX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: FNFWX (1.15) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than FNFWX: ACEMX (15 years) vs FNFWX (6 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. FNFWX (46.00). FNFWX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: FNFWX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.11 vs. FNFWX (26.83). FNFWX return over 5 years is better than : 17.31 vs. ACEMX (10.62).
| ACEMX | FNFWX | ACEMX / FNFWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.69 | 333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.69 | 413% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.656 | 15.187 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.11 | 26.83 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.32 | 52.95 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.62 | 17.31 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement