Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs FNFWX
ACEMX vs FNFWX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs FNFWX
ACEMX vs FNFWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNFWX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. ACEMX (23.5M). FNFWX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: FNFWX (1.15) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than FNFWX: ACEMX (16 years) vs FNFWX (6 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than FNFWX (0.69). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. FNFWX (46.00). FNFWX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: FNFWX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.49 vs. FNFWX (19.58). FNFWX return over 5 years is better than : 15.71 vs. ACEMX (4.68).
| ACEMX | FNFWX | ACEMX / FNFWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.69 | 333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.69 | 413% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.951 | 12.672 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.49 | 19.58 | 186% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.77 | 43.95 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.68 | 15.71 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers