Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds New World R1
Price$90.54
Change+$0.22 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. ACEMX (18.6M). ACEMX (0.00) and RNWAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX (16.99) and RNWAX (16.47) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.27 vs. ACEMX (6.24).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.66 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.283 | 22.966 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.99 | 16.47 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 46.15 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.24 | 27.27 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.32 | 90.20 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement