Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$12.15
Change+$0.10 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.1M
American Funds New World R1
Price$91.70
Change+$0.63 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.16B
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 75.2B vs. ACEMX (19.1M). ACEMX (0.00) and RNWAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.32 vs. ACEMX (11.99). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.89 vs. ACEMX (5.52).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.66 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.709 | 24.542 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19.1M | 75.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.99 | 13.32 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.49 | 55.43 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.52 | 24.89 | 22% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.80 | 87.40 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement