Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.08M
American Funds New World R1
Price$86.80
Change+$0.30 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. ACEMX (18.1M). ACEMX (0.00) and RNWAX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWAX (37.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. ACEMX (10.51). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 18.17 vs. ACEMX (-0.62).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 1.66 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 1.66 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.562 | 17.887 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 12.00 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.36 | 36.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 18.17 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.20 | 81.02 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement