Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWAX
ACEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ACEMX (25M). RNWAX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWAX (0.49) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RNWAX (1.66). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWAX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.06 vs. RNWAX (29.72). RNWAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.20 vs. ACEMX (11.22).
| ACEMX | RNWAX | ACEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 1.66 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 1.66 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.000 | 18.218 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.06 | 29.72 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.41 | 52.55 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.22 | 15.20 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.19 | 121.98 | 100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers