Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.08M
American Funds New World R5
Price$91.70
Change+$0.33 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. ACEMX (18.1M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (1.04) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.32 vs. ACEMX (10.51). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.39 vs. ACEMX (-0.62).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.62 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.62 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.562 | 18.690 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.04 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 13.32 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.36 | 39.23 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 23.39 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.20 | 89.97 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement