Ad is loading...
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$9.63
Change+$0.10 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets15.4M
American Funds New World R5
Price$76.20
Change+$0.48 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets59.57B
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 59.6B vs. ACEMX (15.4M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (1.17) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (14 years) vs RNWFX (23 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWFX (37.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.78 vs. ACEMX (0.00). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 33.58 vs. ACEMX (12.91).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.62 | 376% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.62 | 481% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.953 | -1.372 | 215% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.4M | 59.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.00 | 0.78 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.80 | 5.03 | -95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.91 | 33.58 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.13 | 39.74 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...