Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWFX
ACEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ACEMX (25M). RNWFX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWFX (1.20) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWFX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.06 vs. RNWFX (31.39). RNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.98 vs. ACEMX (11.22).
| ACEMX | RNWFX | ACEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.62 | 371% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.62 | 460% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.000 | 18.794 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.06 | 31.39 | 156% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.41 | 58.06 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.22 | 20.98 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.19 | 135.60 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers