Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.64M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.10
Change+$0.23 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.08B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Sep 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. ACEMX (18.6M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (0.97) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWHX (17.66) and ACEMX (16.99) have marching annual gain over last year. RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 32.18 vs. ACEMX (6.24).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.283 | 23.783 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.6M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.97 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.99 | 17.66 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.34 | 49.13 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.24 | 32.18 | 19% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.32 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement