Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.05M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.22
Change-$0.11 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.13B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.1B vs. ACEMX (19M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (0.90) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.11 vs. ACEMX (18.09). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.32 vs. ACEMX (-2.46).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.978 | 23.941 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 19M | 74.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.09 | 19.11 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.26 | 45.92 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.46 | 20.32 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.69 | 88.47 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement