Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
Alger Emerging Markets C
Price$11.30
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.08M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$90.17
Change+$0.32 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets71.77B
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 71.8B vs. ACEMX (18.1M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (1.00) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). ACEMX (2.98) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 111.97 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). RNWHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.15 vs. ACEMX (10.51). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 22.76 vs. ACEMX (-0.62).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.33 | 0.72 | 324% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.98 | 0.72 | 414% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.562 | 18.614 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1M | 71.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.51 | 13.15 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.36 | 38.85 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.62 | 22.76 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement