Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. ACEMX (25M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (1.15) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (15 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.06 vs. RNWHX (31.15). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 20.21 vs. ACEMX (11.22).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.72 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.72 | 396% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.000 | 18.743 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25M | 90.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.06 | 31.15 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 79.41 | 57.37 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.22 | 20.21 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.19 | 132.48 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers