Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a Buy and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. ACEMX (22.3M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (1.17) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (16 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.41 vs. RNWHX (21.78). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 17.87 vs. ACEMX (3.63).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.72 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.72 | 396% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.049 | 13.978 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.3M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.17 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.41 | 21.78 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.44 | 44.40 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.63 | 17.87 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.53 | 107.97 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement