Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts ACEMX vs RNWHX
ACEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACEMX is a StrongBuy and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.7B vs. ACEMX (23.5M). RNWHX pays higher dividends than ACEMX: RNWHX (1.14) vs ACEMX (0.00). ACEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: ACEMX (16 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). ACEMX (2.85) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). ACEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.39 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACEMX: RNWHX (250) vs ACEMX (1000). ACEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.49 vs. RNWHX (19.47). RNWHX return over 5 years is better than : 14.04 vs. ACEMX (4.68).
| ACEMX | RNWHX | ACEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.30 | 0.72 | 319% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.85 | 0.72 | 396% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.951 | 12.651 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5M | 90.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.14 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.49 | 19.47 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.77 | 43.67 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.68 | 14.04 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.25 | 107.31 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers