ACES
Price
$41.15
Change
-$0.57 (-1.37%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:02 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
154.43M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ICLN
Price
$23.23
Change
+$0.14 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jun 4, 03:31 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
3.32B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACES vs ICLN

Header iconACES vs ICLN Comparison
Open Charts ACES vs ICLNBanner chart's image
ACES vs ICLN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) vs. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN)

Key Takeaways

  • ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) provides concentrated exposure to North American clean energy companies, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) offers broader global diversification across clean energy sectors.
  • Both ETFs track passive indexes focused on clean energy themes, with ACES emphasizing U.S. and Canadian renewables and clean technology firms and ICLN spanning multiple continents and sub-sectors including renewables and equipment providers.
  • Expense ratios differ, with ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) at 0.55% and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) at 0.39%, influencing long-term cost efficiency for investors.
  • ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) typically maintains fewer holdings and higher sector concentration in North American markets, potentially leading to greater volatility compared to the more diversified iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
  • Both ETFs target similar investor goals of clean energy exposure but differ in geographic scope and risk profiles, positioning them as alternatives rather than direct competitors within the thematic sector.
  • Structural features such as index methodology and rebalancing support passive management in both funds, with liquidity varying based on trading volumes and market maker activity.

Introduction

ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) represent two prominent options for investors seeking exposure to the clean energy theme. These ETFs do not compete directly but instead offer alternative approaches to accessing the sector: one with a North American focus and the other with global reach. In the current market environment, where energy transition policies and technological advancements continue to shape capital allocation, comparing their structural differences helps investors align portfolios with specific risk tolerances and geographic preferences.

ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) Overview

ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index before fees and expenses. The index targets a diverse set of U.S. and Canadian companies involved in renewables and clean technology. The fund typically holds between 30 and 50 securities, resulting in a concentrated portfolio. Top holdings often include major players in solar, wind, and clean technology equipment. Sector allocations emphasize alternative energy equipment and services, with significant weight in North American markets. The expense ratio stands at 0.55%. As a thematic ETF, it employs a rules-based index methodology with periodic rebalancing to maintain alignment with the underlying index constituents. Liquidity is supported by its listing on NYSE Arca, though average daily trading volumes can fluctuate with broader market interest in clean energy themes.

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) Overview

iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund designed to track the S&P Global Clean Energy Transition Index. This index provides exposure to global companies engaged in clean energy production and related technologies. The fund holds approximately 106 securities, offering broader diversification across regions and sub-sectors such as renewable electricity, heavy electrical equipment, and semiconductors. Geographic allocations span the United States, China, Europe, and other markets. The expense ratio is 0.39%. The strategy relies on a market-capitalization-weighted index with semi-annual rebalancing. As a global thematic ETF, it benefits from established liquidity on NASDAQ and higher average trading volumes, facilitating efficient entry and exit for investors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The clean energy sector continues to evolve amid global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and transition toward sustainable power sources. Key macro drivers include government incentives for renewables, advancements in battery storage and grid infrastructure, and shifting energy policies in major economies. Capital flows into the sector have been influenced by interest rate environments and commodity price trends, particularly for critical materials used in clean technologies. Regulatory developments, such as expanded tax credits and emissions standards, provide tailwinds, while risks include supply chain constraints, policy shifts, and competition from traditional energy sources. Both ETFs operate within this dynamic landscape, where sector momentum depends on long-term decarbonization trends rather than short-term cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has exhibited higher volatility due to its concentrated North American holdings and sensitivity to domestic policy changes and commodity trends. iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has shown relatively smoother performance through broader geographic diversification, mitigating some regional risks but exposing investors to currency fluctuations and varying regulatory environments worldwide. Both have responded to sector rotation patterns, with performance influenced by earnings from top holdings in renewables and equipment manufacturing, as well as broader interest rate expectations affecting growth-oriented clean energy firms. Relative positioning highlights ACES for investors prioritizing U.S.-centric exposure and ICLN for those seeking global spread and potentially lower single-market risk.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional insights tailored to your investment criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) in the current environment. Its lower expense ratio, higher number of holdings for improved diversification, and global exposure provide a more balanced risk profile amid ongoing sector volatility. ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) remains competitive for investors specifically targeting North American clean energy leaders, though its higher concentration and costs may warrant closer monitoring of trend consistency and sector momentum.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ACES vs. ICLN commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACES is a StrongBuy and ICLN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ICLN has more net assets: 3.32B vs. ACES (154M). ICLN has a higher annual dividend yield than ACES: ICLN (40.536) vs ACES (28.724). ACES was incepted earlier than ICLN: ACES (8 years) vs ICLN (18 years). ICLN (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than ACES (0.55). ACES has a higher turnover ICLN (25.00) vs ICLN (25.00).
ACESICLNACES / ICLN
Gain YTD28.72440.53671%
Net Assets154M3.32B5%
Total Expense Ratio0.550.39141%
Turnover39.0025.00156%
Yield0.541.1448%
Fund Existence8 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACESICLN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACES
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ICLN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BROCX24.11N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage International Inv C
GWGIX22.11N/A
N/A
AMG GW&K Small Mid Cap Core I
LAVTX17.12N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity R5
NMUEX12.39N/A
N/A
Neuberger Multi-Cap Opportunities E
AFAZX12.94-0.08
-0.61%
Applied Finance Dividend Institutional

ACES and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACES has been loosely correlated with NXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACES jumps, then NXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACES
1D Price
Change %
ACES100%
-2.84%
NXT - ACES
64%
Loosely correlated
-3.78%
ENPH - ACES
61%
Loosely correlated
-4.58%
RUN - ACES
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
BLDP - ACES
59%
Loosely correlated
-5.02%
BLNK - ACES
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.36%
More