Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFCX vs RGAFX
ACFCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts ACFCX vs RGAFX
ACFCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACFCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFCX is a Hold and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. ACFCX (2.24B). RGAFX pays higher dividends than ACFCX: RGAFX (0.46) vs ACFCX (0.00). ACFCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: ACFCX (20 years) vs RGAFX (24 years). ACFCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). RGAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ACFCX (15.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACFCX: RGAFX (250) vs ACFCX (2500). ACFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.36 vs. RGAFX (15.34). ACFCX return over 5 years is better than : 55.56 vs. RGAFX (26.83).
| ACFCX | RGAFX | ACFCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.34 | 397% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.34 | 397% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.226 | 10.570 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.24B | 338B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.36 | 15.34 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.40 | 55.04 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.56 | 26.83 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 414.14 | 116.58 | 355% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers