Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFLX vs RMEBX
ACFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACFLX vs RMEBX
ACFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ACFLX (2.9B). ACFLX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACFLX (2.05) vs RMEBX (1.04). ACFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACFLX (4 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than ACFLX (0.49). ACFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). ACFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: ACFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). ACFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. RMEBX (9.11).
| ACFLX | RMEBX | ACFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.07 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.07 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.896 | 6.308 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 117B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 1.04 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 9.11 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.05 | 34.37 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 34.74 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers