Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFLX vs RMEBX
ACFLX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACFLX vs RMEBX
ACFLX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACFLX (2.93B). ACFLX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: ACFLX (1.81) vs RMEBX (0.99). ACFLX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACFLX (4 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than ACFLX (0.49). ACFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). ACFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMEBX: ACFLX (0) vs RMEBX (250). ACFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. RMEBX (9.03).
| ACFLX | RMEBX | ACFLX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.07 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.07 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.299 | 10.367 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 0.99 | 183% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 9.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.33 | 38.30 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 35.75 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 90.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers