Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFLX vs RWEBX
ACFLX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACFLX vs RWEBX
ACFLX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. ACFLX (2.9B). ACFLX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: ACFLX (2.05) vs RWEBX (0.75). ACFLX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: ACFLX (4 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). RWEBX (1.06) is less costly to investors than ACFLX (0.49). ACFLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 84.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). ACFLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: ACFLX (0) vs RWEBX (250). ACFLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.82 vs. RWEBX (7.27).
| ACFLX | RWEBX | ACFLX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.06 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 1.06 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.896 | 1.220 | 647% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.05 | 0.75 | 272% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.82 | 7.27 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.05 | 27.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 23.58 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 75.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers