Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACFOX vs RGACX
ACFOX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts ACFOX vs RGACX
ACFOX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACFOX vs. RGACX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACFOX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. ACFOX (2.05B). ACFOX (0.00) and RGACX (0.00) have matching dividends . ACFOX was incepted earlier than RGACX: ACFOX (20 years) vs RGACX (24 years). RGACX (0.93) is less costly to investors than ACFOX (0.85). RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. ACFOX (15.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACFOX: RGACX (250) vs ACFOX (2500). ACFOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.47 vs. RGACX (-0.31). ACFOX return over 5 years is better than : 25.66 vs. RGACX (9.25).
| ACFOX | RGACX | ACFOX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.93 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.343 | 4.467 | -52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.05B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | -0.31 | -478% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.99 | 34.18 | 187% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.66 | 9.25 | 277% |
| Returns for 10 years | 359.11 | 93.53 | 384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers