Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGCX vs RMEBX
ACGCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts ACGCX vs RMEBX
ACGCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGCX is a Hold and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACGCX (2.06B). RMEBX pays higher dividends than ACGCX: RMEBX (1.00) vs ACGCX (0.22). ACGCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: ACGCX (25 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). ACGCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). ACGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGCX: RMEBX (250) vs ACGCX (2500). ACGCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.75 vs. RMEBX (6.88). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.24 vs. ACGCX (2.35).
| ACGCX | RMEBX | ACGCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 1.07 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.004 | 8.533 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 118B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 1.00 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 6.88 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.23 | 30.86 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.35 | 35.24 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.70 | 88.54 | 36% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement