Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGGX vs FGDTX
ACGGX vs FGDTX Comparison
Open Charts ACGGX vs FGDTX
ACGGX vs FGDTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGGX vs. FGDTX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGGX is a Hold and FGDTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGDTX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. ACGGX (1.77B). FGDTX pays higher dividends than ACGGX: FGDTX (4.22) vs ACGGX (0.52). ACGGX was incepted earlier than FGDTX: ACGGX (28 years) vs FGDTX (20 years). FGDTX (1.19) is less costly to investors than ACGGX (0.91). FGDTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. ACGGX (20.00). ACGGX initial investment is less costly to investors than FGDTX (4%) vs FGDTX (4%). FGDTX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGGX: FGDTX (0) vs ACGGX (2500). FGDTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.03 vs. ACGGX (37.65). ACGGX return over 5 years is better than : 219.93 vs. FGDTX (177.70).
| ACGGX | FGDTX | ACGGX / FGDTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.19 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.785 | 14.190 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.44B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 4.22 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.65 | 40.03 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 246.16 | 220.77 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.93 | 177.70 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 269.01 | 202.03 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement