Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGGX vs FSAGX
ACGGX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts ACGGX vs FSAGX
ACGGX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGGX vs. FSAGX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGGX is a Hold and FSAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 4.44B vs. ACGGX (1.77B). FSAGX pays higher dividends than ACGGX: FSAGX (4.29) vs ACGGX (0.52). ACGGX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: ACGGX (28 years) vs FSAGX (41 years). ACGGX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.64). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. ACGGX (20.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGGX: FSAGX (0) vs ACGGX (2500). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.83 vs. ACGGX (37.65). ACGGX return over 5 years is better than : 219.93 vs. FSAGX (185.56).
| ACGGX | FSAGX | ACGGX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.64 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.64 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.785 | 14.634 | 60% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.77B | 4.44B | 40% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 4.29 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | 37.65 | 40.83 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 246.16 | 226.15 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 219.93 | 185.56 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 269.01 | 216.84 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement