Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGKX vs RMFCX
ACGKX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACGKX vs RMFCX
ACGKX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGKX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGKX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. ACGKX (4.39B). RMFCX pays higher dividends than ACGKX: RMFCX (1.19) vs ACGKX (0.40). ACGKX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACGKX (33 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). ACGKX (1.52) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACGKX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGKX: RMFCX (250) vs ACGKX (1000). ACGKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.38 vs. RMFCX (9.31). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.71 vs. ACGKX (-9.76).
| ACGKX | RMFCX | ACGKX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.91 | 167% |
| Fund Existence | 33 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.608 | 6.953 | 124% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.39B | 117B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.40 | 1.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.38 | 9.31 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.18 | 34.52 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.76 | 34.71 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.14 | 94.50 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement