It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACGLN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACGLN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
ACGLN (@Multi-Line Insurance) experienced а -1.05% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Multi-Line Insurance industry was -1.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.34%.
A multi-line insurance contract bundles together exposures to risk and covers them under a single contract. For providers of such policies, the bundle is a potential risk diversification strategy since their exposure gets spread over several factors, which helps them mitigate a financial burden if a catastrophic event were to occur. Other potential benefits include getting more premiums from including more than one type of insurance in a bundle, and getting a competitive edge by procuring multiple insurance contracts with a customer. Examples of companies in this industry are Berkshire Hathaway (which owns several insurance companies), Chubb Limited, American International Group, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.
| ACGLN | FPFD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 37% | 1 day ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 28% | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 44% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 25% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 27% | 13 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 43% | 1 day ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 30% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 58% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPFD has been loosely correlated with TBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPFD jumps, then TBB could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPFD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPFD | 100% | -0.13% | ||
| TBB - FPFD | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| HBANP - FPFD | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| BPYPO - FPFD | 23% Poorly correlated | +1.46% | ||
| ACGLN - FPFD | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BPYPN - FPFD | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||