Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGMX vs RMFCX
ACGMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACGMX vs RMFCX
ACGMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGMX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 115B vs. ACGMX (4.31B). ACGMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ACGMX (1.29) vs RMFCX (1.19). ACGMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACGMX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ACGMX (0.53). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACGMX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGMX: RMFCX (250) vs ACGMX (1000). ACGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.69 vs. RMFCX (10.10). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.85 vs. ACGMX (-6.96).
| ACGMX | RMFCX | ACGMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.633 | 5.845 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.31B | 115B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 1.19 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.69 | 10.10 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.43 | 34.65 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.96 | 33.85 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.00 | 91.46 | 19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement