Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACGMX vs RMFCX
ACGMX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts ACGMX vs RMFCX
ACGMX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ACGMX vs. RMFCX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGMX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. ACGMX (4.4B). ACGMX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: ACGMX (1.26) vs RMFCX (1.15). ACGMX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: ACGMX (22 years) vs RMFCX (24 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than ACGMX (0.53). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. ACGMX (26.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACGMX: RMFCX (250) vs ACGMX (1000). ACGMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. RMFCX (9.09). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.08 vs. ACGMX (-1.42).
| ACGMX | RMFCX | ACGMX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.53 | 0.91 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.766 | 9.496 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.4B | 118B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.26 | 1.15 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.64 | 9.09 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.17 | 33.16 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.42 | 37.08 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.83 | 92.36 | 23% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement