ACGP
Price
$32.15
Change
-$0.82 (-2.49%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
678.16M
SEIC
Price
$86.98
Change
+$0.10 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 11, 12:50 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
10.74B
41 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGP vs SEIC

Header iconACGP vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts ACGP vs SEICBanner chart's image
Associated Capital Group
Price$32.15
Change-$0.82 (-2.49%)
Volume$1.98K
Capitalization678.16M
SEI Investments
Price$86.98
Change+$0.10 (+0.12%)
Volume$500
Capitalization10.74B
ACGP vs SEIC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGP vs. SEIC commentary
Sep 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGP is a StrongBuy and SEIC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 11, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGP: $32.15 vs. SEIC: $86.88)
Brand notoriety: ACGP and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGP: 12% vs. SEIC: 77%
Market capitalization -- ACGP: $678.16M vs. SEIC: $10.74B
ACGP [@Investment Managers] is valued at $678.16M. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than ACGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGP is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

ACGP (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.63% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.29% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($10.7B) has a higher market cap than ACGP($678M). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than ACGP: SEIC (16.33) vs ACGP (12.66). SEIC YTD gains are higher at: 5.941 vs. ACGP (-6.157). SEIC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 957M vs. ACGP (67.5M). SEIC has more cash in the bank: 778M vs. ACGP (392M). SEIC has higher revenues than ACGP: SEIC (2.21B) vs ACGP (11.9M).
ACGPSEICACGP / SEIC
Capitalization678M10.7B6%
EBITDA67.5M957M7%
Gain YTD-6.1575.941-104%
P/E Ratio12.6616.3378%
Revenue11.9M2.21B1%
Total Cash392M778M50%
Total DebtN/A29M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGP vs SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
ACGP
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
176
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10024
SMR RATING
1..100
8332
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6450
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGP's Valuation (31) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SEIC (87). This means that ACGP’s stock grew somewhat faster than SEIC’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACGP (100). This means that SEIC’s stock grew significantly faster than ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's SMR Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGP (83). This means that SEIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ACGP (64). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

SEIC's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as ACGP (91). This means that SEIC’s stock grew similarly to ACGP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGPSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USO74.711.32
+1.80%
United States Oil
NAPR52.310.04
+0.09%
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Pwr Bffr ETF Apr
CADCNY5.14N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - China Yuan
CNYHKD1.09N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Hong Kong Dollar
GBPHKD10.53N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - Hong Kong Dollar

ACGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACGP has been loosely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACGP jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGP
1D Price
Change %
ACGP100%
-2.49%
SEIC - ACGP
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
OWL - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
+4.67%
PFG - ACGP
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BN - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
TROW - ACGP
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
+0.27%
TROW - SEIC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
JHG - SEIC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
BN - SEIC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.30%
KKR - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
+1.38%
AMG - SEIC
73%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
More