ACGX
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
197.59K
IFLXF
Price
$1.01
Change
+$0.24 (+31.17%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
43.33M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACGX vs IFLXF

Header iconACGX vs IFLXF Comparison
Open Charts ACGX vs IFLXFBanner chart's image
Alliance Creative Group
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.07K
Capitalization197.59K
Imaflex
Price$1.01
Change+$0.24 (+31.17%)
Volume$10.02K
Capitalization43.33M
ACGX vs IFLXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ACGX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACGX vs. IFLXF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACGX is a StrongBuy and IFLXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (ACGX: $0.07 vs. IFLXF: $1.01)
Brand notoriety: ACGX and IFLXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACGX: 9% vs. IFLXF: 150%
Market capitalization -- ACGX: $197.59K vs. IFLXF: $43.33M
ACGX [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $197.59K. IFLXF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $43.33M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $4.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACGX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFLXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ACGX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFLXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACGX is a better buy in the long-term than IFLXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACGX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFLXF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACGX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • IFLXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACGX is a better buy in the short-term than IFLXF.

Price Growth

ACGX (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а -12.63% price change this week, while IFLXF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACGX is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (-0.74% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IFLXF($43.3M) has a higher market cap than ACGX($198K). IFLXF has higher P/E ratio than ACGX: IFLXF (7.34) vs ACGX (0.48). ACGX YTD gains are higher at: 2.794 vs. IFLXF (1.000). IFLXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.3M vs. ACGX (-104.89K). IFLXF has more cash in the bank: 6.49M vs. ACGX (232K). ACGX has less debt than IFLXF: ACGX (1.19M) vs IFLXF (6.97M). IFLXF has higher revenues than ACGX: IFLXF (104M) vs ACGX (15.3M).
ACGXIFLXFACGX / IFLXF
Capitalization198K43.3M0%
EBITDA-104.89K14.3M-1%
Gain YTD2.7941.000279%
P/E Ratio0.487.347%
Revenue15.3M104M15%
Total Cash232K6.49M4%
Total Debt1.19M6.97M17%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACGX vs IFLXF: Fundamental Ratings
ACGX
IFLXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8649
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
370
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
897
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACGX's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as IFLXF (72). This means that ACGX’s stock grew similarly to IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

IFLXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACGX (100). This means that IFLXF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACGX’s over the last 12 months.

ACGX's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFLXF (70). This means that ACGX’s stock grew significantly faster than IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

IFLXF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as ACGX (64). This means that IFLXF’s stock grew similarly to ACGX’s over the last 12 months.

ACGX's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for IFLXF (97). This means that ACGX’s stock grew significantly faster than IFLXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACGXIFLXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACGX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFLXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HOIEF12.44N/A
N/A
Hosiden Corporation
MVLY15.70N/A
N/A
Mission Valley Bancorp
RSTRF70.45N/A
N/A
Restaurant Brands International Limited Partnership
AVIJF0.37N/A
N/A
Avichina Industry & Technology
ALTX0.28-0.01
-3.45%
Altex Industries, Inc.

ACGX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ACGX and IFLXF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ACGX and IFLXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACGX
1D Price
Change %
ACGX100%
N/A
IFLXF - ACGX
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJSF - ACGX
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADNF - ACGX
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCDBF - ACGX
-4%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
GRVWF - ACGX
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

IFLXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that IFLXF and ACGX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that IFLXF and ACGX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFLXF
1D Price
Change %
IFLXF100%
N/A
ACGX - IFLXF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRVWF - IFLXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CADNF - IFLXF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMCCF - IFLXF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOYFF - IFLXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More