It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ACHC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileENSG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ACHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ENSG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ACHC (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -7.35% price change this week, while ENSG (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1650.83%.
ACHC is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
ENSG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
ACHC | ENSG | ACHC / ENSG | |
Capitalization | 7.02B | 7.05B | 100% |
EBITDA | 189M | 353M | 54% |
Gain YTD | -51.363 | 28.055 | -183% |
P/E Ratio | 24.81 | 33.94 | 73% |
Revenue | 2.93B | 3.73B | 79% |
Total Cash | 100M | 527M | 19% |
Total Debt | 1.5B | 1.87B | 80% |
ACHC | ENSG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 62 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 76 | 27 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ACHC's Valuation (62) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ENSG (79). This means that ACHC’s stock grew similarly to ENSG’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for ACHC (84). This means that ENSG’s stock grew significantly faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's SMR Rating (56) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as ACHC (69). This means that ENSG’s stock grew similarly to ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (94). This means that ENSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ENSG's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACHC (76). This means that ENSG’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACHC’s over the last 12 months.
ACHC | ENSG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago64% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago67% | 3 days ago59% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago74% | 3 days ago53% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago62% | 3 days ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago68% | 3 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago68% | 26 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago63% | 3 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago71% | 3 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago64% | 3 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ALTL | 38.67 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF | |||
KXI | 61.71 | -0.35 | -0.56% |
iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | |||
JIRE | 60.81 | -0.36 | -0.59% |
JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF | |||
NVBW | 30.77 | -0.23 | -0.74% |
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cp Buffer20 Nov ETF | |||
FXP | 19.67 | -0.23 | -1.16% |
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACHC has been loosely correlated with UHS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACHC jumps, then UHS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ACHC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ACHC | 100% | -3.91% | ||
UHS - ACHC | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.34% | ||
CIVI - ACHC | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
SGRY - ACHC | 31% Poorly correlated | -7.35% | ||
EHC - ACHC | 30% Poorly correlated | -2.33% | ||
ENSG - ACHC | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.50% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ENSG has been loosely correlated with USPH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ENSG jumps, then USPH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ENSG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ENSG | 100% | -1.50% | ||
USPH - ENSG | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
AVAH - ENSG | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
SGRY - ENSG | 37% Loosely correlated | -7.35% | ||
PNTG - ENSG | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.47% | ||
THC - ENSG | 35% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
More |