ACI
Price
$12.72
Change
+$0.18 (+1.44%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.65B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFM
Price
$63.60
Change
-$0.73 (-1.13%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
5.92B
14 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACI vs SFM

ACI vs SFM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACI vs. SFM commentary
Oct 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACI is a Hold and SFM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACI vs SFM: Fundamental Ratings
ACI
SFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2118
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
8629
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
289
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ACI's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFM (81) in the Food Retail industry. This means that ACI’s stock grew significantly faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as ACI (100) in the null industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to ACI’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's SMR Rating (29) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ACI (86) in the null industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ACI’s over the last 12 months.

ACI's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as SFM (76) in the Food Retail industry. This means that ACI’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.

ACI's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFM (89) in the Food Retail industry. This means that ACI’s stock grew significantly faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACISFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 14, 2026
Stock price -- (ACI: $12.72 vs. SFM: $63.60)
Brand notoriety: ACI and SFM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACI: 225% vs. SFM: 104%
Market capitalization -- ACI: $5.65B vs. SFM: $5.92B
ACI [@Food Retail] is valued at $5.65B. SFM’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $5.92B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $80 to $51.42B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $4.18B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while SFM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SFM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ACI is a better buy in the long-term than SFM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACI is a better buy in the short-term than SFM.

Price Growth

ACI (@Food Retail) experienced а +10.80% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was -2.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACI is expected to report earnings on Jan 12, 2027.

SFM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+1.63% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

View a ticker or compare two or three
ACI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDVI31.280.36
+1.16%
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF (TDVI)
AMDW98.021.01
+1.04%
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
EWC59.910.46
+0.77%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF (EWC)
JANP36.060.01
+0.03%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - January (JANP)
OKTG66.58-0.42
-0.62%
Leverage Shares 2X Long OKTA Daily ETF (OKTG)

ACI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACI has been loosely correlated with KR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACI jumps, then KR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACI
1D Price
Change %
ACI100%
+1.44%
KR - ACI
57%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
IMKTA - ACI
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
WMK - ACI
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
NGVC - ACI
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
SFM - ACI
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More

SFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFM
1D Price
Change %
SFM100%
-1.13%
NGVC - SFM
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
KR - SFM
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.91%
ACI - SFM
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
GO - SFM
24%
Poorly correlated
+3.52%
IMKTA - SFM
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
More