GO
Price
$9.58
Change
+$0.16 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
947.68M
58 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFM
Price
$86.33
Change
-$1.79 (-2.03%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
8.12B
52 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GO vs SFM

Header iconGO vs SFM Comparison
Open Charts GO vs SFMBanner chart's image
GO vs SFM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GO vs. SFM commentary
Jun 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GO is a StrongBuy and SFM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 14, 2026
Stock price -- (GO: $9.58 vs. SFM: $86.33)
Brand notoriety: GO and SFM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GO: 76% vs. SFM: 60%
Market capitalization -- GO: $947.68M vs. SFM: $8.12B
GO [@Food Retail] is valued at $947.68M. SFM’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $8.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $51.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $4.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GO is a better buy in the long-term than SFM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFM’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFM is a better buy in the short-term than GO.

Price Growth

GO (@Food Retail) experienced а +11.92% price change this week, while SFM (@Food Retail) price change was +4.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

GO is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

SFM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (+1.22% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFM($8.12B) has a higher market cap than GO($948M). GO has higher P/E ratio than SFM: GO (177.13) vs SFM (16.57). SFM YTD gains are higher at: 8.359 vs. GO (-5.149). SFM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 994M vs. GO (-241.69M). SFM has more cash in the bank: 252M vs. GO (59M). GO has less debt than SFM: GO (1.84B) vs SFM (2.06B). SFM has higher revenues than GO: SFM (8.9B) vs GO (4.73B).
GOSFMGO / SFM
Capitalization948M8.12B12%
EBITDA-241.69M994M-24%
Gain YTD-5.1498.359-62%
P/E Ratio177.1316.571,069%
Revenue4.73B8.9B53%
Total Cash59M252M23%
Total Debt1.84B2.06B89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GO vs SFM: Fundamental Ratings
GO
SFM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
826
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
9925
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
294
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GO's Valuation (75) in the null industry is in the same range as SFM (81) in the Food Retail industry. This means that GO’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as GO (100) in the null industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew similarly to GO’s over the last 12 months.

SFM's SMR Rating (25) in the Food Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for GO (99) in the null industry. This means that SFM’s stock grew significantly faster than GO’s over the last 12 months.

GO's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SFM (60) in the Food Retail industry. This means that GO’s stock grew similarly to SFM’s over the last 12 months.

GO's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SFM (94) in the Food Retail industry. This means that GO’s stock grew significantly faster than SFM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOSFM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VNOM44.380.68
+1.56%
Viper Energy
BCML32.210.29
+0.91%
BayCom Corp
FERAU10.62N/A
N/A
Fifth Era Acquisition Corp I
VET11.15-0.06
-0.54%
Vermilion Energy
PRPL0.42N/A
-1.16%
Purple Innovation

GO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GO has been loosely correlated with WMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GO jumps, then WMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GO
1D Price
Change %
GO100%
+1.70%
WMK - GO
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
IMKTA - GO
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
VLGEA - GO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
DNUT - GO
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.62%
NGVC - GO
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
More

SFM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFM has been loosely correlated with NGVC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SFM jumps, then NGVC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFM
1D Price
Change %
SFM100%
-2.03%
NGVC - SFM
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.73%
ACI - SFM
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
IMKTA - SFM
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
KR - SFM
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
GO - SFM
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
More