ACIC
Price
$11.54
Change
+$0.39 (+3.50%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
559.28M
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KINS
Price
$20.12
Change
+$1.93 (+10.61%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
291.44M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ACIC vs KINS

ACIC vs KINS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ACIC vs. KINS commentary
Jul 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ACIC is a StrongBuy and KINS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2026
Stock price -- (ACIC: $11.15 vs. KINS: $18.19)
Brand notoriety: ACIC and KINS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ACIC: 321% vs. KINS: 369%
Market capitalization -- ACIC: $559.28M vs. KINS: $291.44M
ACIC [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $559.28M. KINS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $291.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $140.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ACIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKINS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ACIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KINS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KINS is a better buy in the long-term than ACIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ACIC’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KINS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ACIC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • KINS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ACIC is a better buy in the short-term than KINS.

Price Growth

ACIC (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +3.62% price change this week, while KINS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +6.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +7.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

ACIC is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

KINS is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+7.28% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ACIC($559M) has a higher market cap than KINS($291M). KINS has higher P/E ratio than ACIC: KINS (7.58) vs ACIC (5.00). KINS YTD gains are higher at: 8.765 vs. ACIC (-6.145). ACIC has more cash in the bank: 229M vs. KINS (157M). KINS has less debt than ACIC: KINS (4.12M) vs ACIC (153M). ACIC has higher revenues than KINS: ACIC (334M) vs KINS (224M).
ACICKINSACIC / KINS
Capitalization559M291M192%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-6.1458.765-70%
P/E Ratio5.007.5866%
Revenue334M224M149%
Total Cash229M157M146%
Total Debt153M4.12M3,711%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ACIC vs KINS: Fundamental Ratings
ACIC
KINS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4140
SMR RATING
1..100
2732
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5141
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8073
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KINS's Valuation (43) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ACIC (66) in the null industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to ACIC’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ACIC (41) in the null industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to ACIC’s over the last 12 months.

ACIC's SMR Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as KINS (32) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that ACIC’s stock grew similarly to KINS’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ACIC (51) in the null industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to ACIC’s over the last 12 months.

KINS's P/E Growth Rating (73) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as ACIC (80) in the null industry. This means that KINS’s stock grew similarly to ACIC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ACICKINS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ACIC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KINS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JGETX13.570.17
+1.27%
JHancock Global Equity R4
FBFRX13.640.10
+0.74%
Franklin Managed Income R6
JDBRX48.930.01
+0.02%
Janus Henderson Balanced R
LGCRX21.42-0.08
-0.37%
Lord Abbett Global Equity R3
PZISX15.67-0.15
-0.95%
Pzena Small Cap Value Institutional

ACIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ACIC has been loosely correlated with BOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ACIC jumps, then BOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ACIC
1D Price
Change %
ACIC100%
N/A
BOW - ACIC
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
MCY - ACIC
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
UVE - ACIC
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
CNA - ACIC
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.08%
SKWD - ACIC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

KINS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KINS has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KINS jumps, then L could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KINS
1D Price
Change %
KINS100%
N/A
L - KINS
41%
Loosely correlated
+2.10%
TRV - KINS
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
ACIC - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SAFT - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CINF - KINS
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More