Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACINX vs TRZKX
ACINX vs TRZKX Comparison
Open Charts ACINX vs TRZKX
ACINX vs TRZKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZKX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. ACINX (822M). TRZKX pays higher dividends than ACINX: TRZKX (2.48) vs ACINX (1.85). ACINX was incepted earlier than TRZKX: ACINX (34 years) vs TRZKX (5 years). TRZKX (1.06) and ACINX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . TRZKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.30 vs. ACINX (25.00). TRZKX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACINX: TRZKX (0) vs ACINX (2000). TRZKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. ACINX (3.96). TRZKX return over 5 years is better than : -7.58 vs. ACINX (-28.72).
| ACINX | TRZKX | ACINX / TRZKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.06 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.748 | 15.214 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 822M | 7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.85 | 2.48 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.96 | 18.35 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.09 | 55.56 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -28.72 | -7.58 | 379% |
| Returns for 10 years | -33.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers