Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ACINX vs TRZKX
ACINX vs TRZKX Comparison
Open Charts ACINX vs TRZKX
ACINX vs TRZKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZKX has more cash in the bank: 6.7B vs. ACINX (801M). TRZKX pays higher dividends than ACINX: TRZKX (2.49) vs ACINX (1.82). ACINX was incepted earlier than TRZKX: ACINX (34 years) vs TRZKX (5 years). TRZKX (1.06) and ACINX (1.04) have similar cost to investors . TRZKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 41.30 vs. ACINX (25.00). TRZKX has a lower initial minimum investment than ACINX: TRZKX (0) vs ACINX (2000). TRZKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.16 vs. ACINX (-0.06). TRZKX return over 5 years is better than : -10.48 vs. ACINX (-29.60).
| ACINX | TRZKX | ACINX / TRZKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.06 | 98% |
| Fund Existence | 34 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.419 | 9.535 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 801M | 6.7B | 12% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.49 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.06 | 15.16 | -0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.05 | 46.20 | 11% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.60 | -10.48 | 283% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.23 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement